Choosing a NAS for a Video Editing Team

A NAS gives your team shared storage over a network. Choosing one starts with what your editors need to play, how many people work at once and who will look after it.

By Kevin Luttman · 10+ years as a Post Production Manager
Last updated

Which NAS should a video editing team buy?

For a smaller team without a storage administrator, I’d start by assessing an off-the-shelf QNAP or Synology against the actual workload. I’d look at 45Drives or TrueNAS-based systems when capacity, performance or infrastructure requirements justify them. Every option still needs a named person responsible for maintenance and recovery.

That isn’t a ranking of brands. A suitable system is one your team can afford, operate and recover when something goes wrong. I don’t sell hardware, so the recommendation starts with the workflow.

How do 45Drives, QNAP, Synology and TrueNAS compare?

These aren’t four versions of the same product. 45Drives, QNAP and Synology sell storage systems; TrueNAS is also available as software for your own hardware, as well as integrated enterprise appliances. Compare a complete configuration and support arrangement rather than assuming the brand name tells you the operating cost.

Question
Where I’d consider it Larger storage requirements or infrastructure needing more configuration flexibility Teams assessing a packaged NAS for shared editorial storage Teams assessing a packaged NAS with straightforward day-to-day administration Teams wanting a ZFS-based platform on qualified hardware or a supported appliance
Ease of operation Depends on the chosen architecture and support arrangement Appliance management; complexity depends on configuration Appliance management; complexity depends on configuration Community installations require technical ownership; enterprise appliances have contracted support options
Capacity and growth Size the proposed chassis and expansion path Check the exact model, bays and expansion limits Check the exact model, bays and expansion limits Depends on hardware, pool design and appliance family
Compute Specify against the storage workload and any additional services CPU, memory and expansion vary by model CPU, memory and expansion vary by model Depends on selected hardware; validate it against platform guidance
Who runs it? An internal administrator or an agreed external support provider A named owner, with technical help for setup and recovery A named owner, with technical help for setup and recovery A capable administrator for Community, or an owner working with enterprise support
Support Confirm vendor scope and service terms in the quote Confirm model, region, warranty and support terms Confirm model, region, warranty and support terms Community resources or paid support on eligible enterprise systems
Cost comparison Quote a configured system and ongoing support Include disks, networking, backup and support Include disks, networking, backup and support Include hardware and administration, even when the software is free

45Drives is a Canadian-founded storage manufacturer, not simply a synonym for a custom build. TrueNAS also offers integrated enterprise appliances. Those distinctions matter when deciding who supports the system. Sources: 45Drives, TrueNAS FAQ.

When does a more configurable storage system make sense?

I would consider a more configurable system when a packaged NAS cannot meet a defined requirement, or when a larger supported platform makes operational sense. That might involve substantial capacity growth, specific redundancy requirements or additional services. The benefit needs to justify the hardware, support and administration it brings.

Running extra services on the storage server also needs care. A transcode job should not take resources away from editors trying to play footage. More compute is useful only when you have a plan for how it will be used.

Ask who gets the alert when a disk fails, who orders the replacement and who handles an outage during delivery. Put those answers in the buying decision.

How much storage do you actually need?

Size active storage around the media that must be available for current work, then account for usable capacity, working space and growth. Camera originals, editing copies, renders and long-term archives should be counted separately. A disk-capacity total on a quote is not the same as usable space for projects.

An illustrative sizing exercise:

Input Example assumption
New editing media each month 5 TB
Time that media stays active 3 months
Editing media in the active window 15 TB
Still to add Projects, audio, graphics, renders, retained revisions and agreed free space
Separate decisions Originals, backups and archive copies

This is arithmetic, not a client result or a final NAS specification. Change the retention window from three months to twelve and the editing-media requirement becomes 60 TB before the other allowances.

Decide what you must retain after delivery before deleting anything. Client agreements, future revisions and archive obligations can all change the answer. The editing codec also changes the sizing exercise.

Is 10GbE enough for shared video editing?

10GbE is a useful option to assess for shared editing, but it does not guarantee a particular editor count. Performance depends on the media bitrate, simultaneous streams, storage speed and the entire network path. I size for the busiest realistic session and test representative timelines before calling a system ready.

Include multicam, exports, ingest and backup traffic in that assessment. An editor’s connection, switch and NAS uplink can each become a bottleneck. QNAP’s media and entertainment guide also treats workstation and storage networking as part of the same design.

For remote editors, the office network is only part of the path. A fast NAS does not make a home internet connection faster. Compare remote storage approaches before assuming everyone should edit directly from headquarters.

What mistakes should you avoid before buying a NAS?

The expensive mistakes happen when teams buy capacity before deciding how they will work. Set the editing format, active-media window, performance requirement and backup plan first. Then compare complete quotes, including networking, support and installation, rather than choosing the enclosure with the largest advertised capacity.

Check these points before placing the order:

  • Raw versus usable capacity. Allow for redundancy and operational free space.
  • Backup. RAID helps with some drive failures; it does not replace a separate recoverable copy.
  • Remote access. Specify whether people download media, stream it or control a workstation at the office.
  • Ownership. Someone needs to manage updates, capacity alerts and recovery tests.
  • Delivery dates and complete costs. Get current written quotes, compatible-drive lists and lead times for the actual configuration.

Get an independent review of the storage decision

Bring the quote and a few representative projects. I'll help establish whether the proposed system fits the workload and what else needs to be included.